The Uncanny Valley concept teaches the importance of authenticity and relatability in your voice – so, where does the Neutral English Accent come in?
In 1970, robotics professor Masahiro Mori observed, “In climbing toward the goal of making robots appear human, our affinity for them increases until we come to a valley, which I call the ‘uncanny valley.'”
A toy robot with a cute cartoon face evokes strong empathy, and a perfect human replica would naturally receive a human-like response. However, there isn’t a steady increase in empathy along the spectrum from toy to replica. Instead, our reactions become unexpectedly complex when encountering human-like robots with wooden expressions and rubbery skin.
The Uncanny Valley concept holds an important lesson for the world of voice-over. Here’s why:
The Quest for the Neutral English Accent
Advertisers, producers and content creators worldwide are increasingly seeking voice actors to perform and record in an accent commonly referred to as ‘Neutral English’.
What could this accent be? Surely it’s English spoken without any accent? But what counts as having no accent? Words must be pronounced in some manner. Which pronunciation counts as not being accepted?
As of 2018, the English language is spoken by an estimated 1.5 billion people, equating to 20% of the world’s population. It is recognised as an official language in over 100 countries, and it is spoken natively by about 360 million people. S
So ,where in all this diversity is the ‘neutral English accent’?
Received Pronunciation
Perhaps the neutral accent is a variety of British English known as ‘Received Pronunciation’ (RP), often known today as BBC English.
However, RP is a specific type of British English accent – not English spoken with no accent. The accent owes its status to the dominance of London in British life.
As far back as 1791, we find writers declaring that the London accent is undoubtedly the best – that is, not only the best by courtesy and because it happens to be the pronunciation of the capital – but best by a better title, that of being more generally received.
Today RP is rarely heard, even on the BBC. An earlier form, known as traditional RP, was the accent of the British elites, a classic example being the philosopher Bertrand Russell, a staple of the BBC in the 1950s. His accent was famously satirised, along with the whole culture associated with it in the 1960s.
Even in England today, RP accents are not likely to be heard with much empathy, and in the United States, the accent is a sure sign of a screen villain.
The Neutral American Accent
If British elites once claimed that RP was a neutral accent and that other accents were inferior, this was because of the power of the British Empire – not any facts about accents themselves.
So, maybe this gives us a clue to where the ‘neutral accent’ may now be found.
A variety of American English, supposedly characteristic of US newsreaders, is ‘Standard American’. Yet, given the size of the United States and the diversity of its populations, we might be even more suspicious of the idea of Standard American than of BBC English.
However, some Americans do believe that such an accent exists. The comedian Stephen Colbert shed his Southern accent because it was perceived to be stupid and instead developed a newsreader’s accent:
“You can’t tell where newsmen are from … I’m a manilla envelope,” he says.
The Krapp Theory
Linguists proposed this idea of the ‘General American’ accent in the 1930s.
George Philip Krapp was the first major scholar to use the term ‘General American.’ In his 1925 book, The English Language in America, he roughly described the concept as the variant of English spoken by the country’s majority.
Essentially, he said that New England has a regional dialect, the South has a regional dialect, then everybody else. He explained that sometimes people in New England and the South spoke General American. (Atlasobscura)
But there were problems with this theory. It turned out that there was a great deal of variation within the region, which Krapp claimed was homogeneous.
Worse still, the broad trends in American accents were changing, so much so that after a few decades, the Northeastern Ohio accent, which Krapp had pegged as General American, no longer existed.
A Quest for the Holy Grail
In the end, we will have to accept that the neutral English accent does not exist.
True, there are versions of English that are more or less heavily accented. Still, the fact that we can reduce the amount of accent present in a sample of English does not mean that, in theory, we could reduce the level of accent to zero and get to neutrality.
Accent neutrality is a Holy Grail – something which is eternally sought but never found.
Yet, in the legend, the quest for the Holy Grail also teaches us something… that is where the Uncanny Valley comes in.
As a voice gets less accented and tends towards that nonexistent ideal of neutrality, our reactions to the traces of accent that remain become more subtle and complex. Just as they become more complex when we encounter robots that look very similar to, but not quite the same as, the organic human ideal.
When we hear a strong accent, our first reaction is to apply a stereotype which leaves us thinking we know everything about the speaker (though, of course, we don’t).
But the trace of an accent raises questions, setting up a tension with the stereotype we have stored in long-term memory – does it apply, or doesn’t it?
As a result, we may engage more strongly in the speaker’s words. So if there is no true ‘neutral English accent’, how should companies handle all the diversity in accents that exist? And why are voice-over artists being driven so crazy by the demand to sound ‘neutral’?
That is the topic of our second post of this three-part series.
Listen to English Voice Actors
More from this author
Sometimes we include links to online retail stores such as Amazon. As an Amazon Associate, if you click on a link and make a
purchase, we may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you.
